Home / Company / Public relations / Patent litigation

ParkerVision v. Qualcomm

Case: ParkerVision v. Qualcomm - 3:11-cv-00719 | Filed: 2011-07-20


Document Title

Date Filed

Doc #

Order Granting Motion 266 2013-05-07 08:42:29 268
Qualcomm Opposition to ParkerVision Motion to Compel Expert Discovery

View Notes

2013-05-06 08:51:09 267
Unopposed Motion for Admission of Counsel for Qualcomm 2013-05-06 08:49:22 266
ParkerVision's Answer to Qualcomm Counterclaims 2013-05-06 08:48:12 265
Order on motion to appear pro hac vice 2013-04-23 08:45:53 264
Order on motion to appear pro hac vice 2013-04-24 08:45:38 263
Order on motion to appear pro hac vice 2013-04-23 08:45:09 262
Motion for Leave to Appear 2013-04-23 08:44:33 261
Order on Motion to Seal 2013-04-23 08:42:18 260
Unopposed Motion For Admission Pro Hac Vice, And Written Designation And Consent To Act 2013-04-22 08:51:40 259
Unopposed Motion For Admission Pro Hac Vice, And Written Designation And Consent To Act 2013-04-22 08:50:59 258
Motion 2013-04-22 08:50:23 257
Parkervision Inc.'s Unopposed Motion To Seal 2013-04-19 15:50:44 256
Parkervision's Motion To Compel Expert Discovery, Including Reports And Testimony By Qualcomm's Experts In Prior Actions On Behalf Of Qualcomm

View Notes

2013-04-19 15:47:16 255
Unopposed Motion For Admission Pro Hac Vice, And Written Designation And Consent To Act 2013-04-19 15:55:20 254
Order Granting Motion 251 2013-04-17 09:28:49 253
Order Granting Motion 250 2013-04-17 09:27:40 252
Unopposed Motion For Admission Pro Hac Vice, and Written Designation and Consent to Act 2013-04-16 16:06:52 251
Joint Motion to Extend Expert Discovery Deadline 2013-04-15 20:35:47 250
Endorsed Order granting 247 motion for Andrei Harasymiak, Esq., and Aaron Karp, Esq., to appear pro hac vice 2013-04-12 08:56:08 249